西亚试剂:Comparison of Allogeneic vs Autologous Bone Marrow–Derived
发布时间:2025-09-11
Comparison of Allogeneic vs Autologous Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Delivered by Transendocardial Injection in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Joshua M. Hare, MD; Joel E. Fishman, MD, PhD; Gary Gerstenblith, MD; Darcy L. DiFede Velazquez, RN, BSN; Juan P. Zambrano, MD; Viky Y. Suncion, MD; Melissa Tracy, MD; Eduard Ghersin, MD; Peter V. Johnston, MD; Jeffrey A. Brinker, MD; Elayne Breton, BSN, RN; Janice Davis-Sproul, MAS; Ivonne H. Schulman, MD; John Byrnes, MD; Adam M. Mendizabal, MS; Maureen H. Lowery, MD; Didier Rouy, MD, PhD; Peter Altman, PhD; Cheryl Wong Po Foo, PhD; Phillip Ruiz, MD; Alexandra Amador, BSMT; Jose Da Silva, PhD; Ian K. McNiece, PhD; Alan W. Heldman, MD
Context Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are under evaluation as a therapy for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Both autologous and allogeneic MSC therapies are possible; however, their safety and efficacy have not been compared.
Objective To test whether allogeneic MSCs are as safe and effective as autologous MSCs in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction due to ICM.
Design, Setting, and Patients A phase 1/2 randomized comparison (POSEIDON study) in a US tertiary-care referral hospital of allogeneic and autologous MSCs in 30 patients with LV dysfunction due to ICM between April 2, 2010, and September 14, 2011, with 13-month follow-up.
Intervention Twenty million, 100 million, or 200 million cells (5 patients in each cell type per dose level) were delivered by transendocardial stem cell injection into 10 LV sites.
Main Outcome Measures Thirty-day postcatheterization incidence of predefined treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy assessments included 6-minute walk test, exercise peak VO2, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), New York Heart Association class, LV volumes, ejection fraction (EF), early enhancement defect (EED; infarct size), and sphericity index.
Results Within 30 days, 1 patient in each group (treatment-emergent SAE rate, 6.7%) was hospitalized for heart failure, less than the prespecified stopping event rate of 25%. The 1-year incidence of SAEs was 33.3% (n = 5) in the allogeneic group and 53.3% (n = 8) in the autologous group (P = .46). At 1 year, there were no ventricular arrhythmia SAEs observed among allogeneic recipients compared with 4 patients (26.7%) in the autologous group (P = .10). Relative to baseline, autologous but not allogeneic MSC therapy was associated with an improvement in the 6-minute walk test and the MLHFQ score, but neither improved exercise VO2 max. Allogeneic and autologous MSCs reduced mean EED by ?33.21% (95% CI, ?43.61% to ?22.81%; P < .001) and sphericity index but did not increase EF. Allogeneic MSCs reduced LV end-diastolic volumes. Low-dose concentration MSCs (20 million cells) produced greatest reductions in LV volumes and increased EF. Allogeneic MSCs did not stimulate significant donor-specific alloimmune reactions.
Conclusions In this early-stage study of patients with ICM, transendocardial injection of allogeneic and autologous MSCs without a placebo control were both associated with low rates of treatment-emergent SAEs, including immunologic reactions. In aggregate, MSC injection favorably affected patient functional capacity, quality of life, and ventricular remodeling.
- 以上资料由西亚试剂:http://www.xiyashiji.com/ 提供此产品的详细信息如密度,含量,分子式,分子量等均可在西亚官网查询
- 相关产品如汞乙酸汞氯化汞氧化汞碘化汞硫酸汞硝酸汞溴化汞硝酸亚汞氯化亚汞乙酸苯汞碘化汞钾硫氰酸汞氯化氨基汞三氯生三氯氧磷三氯乙烯水合氯醛三氯化磷三氯化钌三氯化钛三氯化铱三氯化铑三氯硫磷三氯乙烷三氯甲烷三氯卡班TCC1,3,5-三氯苯1,2,4-三氯苯1,2,3-三氯苯无水氯化铝三氯乙酸酐三氯乙酸钠碘甲烷二碘甲烷三碘甲烷 三氟碘甲烷硫酸二甲酯氯磺酸苯硫酚苯硫酚钠3-氨基苯硫酚2,6-二氯苯硫酚2,4-二氯苯硫酚2,5-二氯苯硫酚2-甲氧基苯硫酚2-氯乙醇 等均有销售.欢迎订购
上一篇:现代制药总裁杨军辞职
下一篇:西亚试剂:Redesigning dehalogenase access tunnels as a strategy for d